Award Recipients Research Articles

RADM Anne M. Swap, FACHE, 2024 Recipient of the ACHE Gold Medal Award.

RADM Anne M. Swap, FACHE, 2024 Recipient of the ACHE Gold Medal Award.

Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest

We use the short-lived, but high-profile, China Top Brand Award to examine the causal effects of nonmonetary awards on firm innovation. To do so, we create a panel dataset by matching official China Top Brand Award recipients to the innovation outputs of listed companies. Results from difference-in-differences estimates show that firms that received the China Top Brand Award have a higher number, and better quality, of filed patents. We find that the positive effects of winning the China Top Brand Award on innovation outputs operate through higher government subsidies to winning firms. We also find that the positive effects of award-winning are stronger among state-owned enterprises, larger enterprises, and better-performing enterprises, as well as in provinces with stronger intellectual property rights protection. Our results are robust to a series of sensitivity checks.

A Retrospective Analysis of Leadership, Awardees, and Member Gender Representation of the Canadian Society for Immunology.

The Canadian Society for Immunology (CSI) established a formal Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Committee with the goal of providing EDI advocacy and leadership within the CSI, as well as in the broader scientific community. A first task of this committee was to review the publicly available historical data on gender representation within the CSI's membership, leadership, award recipients, and conference chairs/presenters as a step in establishing a baseline reference point and monitoring the trajectory of future success in achieving true inclusion. We found that, except for overall membership and a specific subset of awards, all categories showed a historical bias toward men, particularly prior to 2010. Bias persists in various categories, evident even in recent years. However, we note an encouraging trend toward greater gender parity, particularly in the roles of President, symposium presenters, and workshop chairs, especially from 2017 onward. We present these findings as well as our recommendations to enhance inclusivity. These include a more comprehensive collection and secure storage of self-identification data, emphasis on EDI as an essential component of all annual meeting activities, and innovative measures of outreach, collaboration, and leadership with the aim of making the CSI a model for improving EDI in other professional research societies.

2023 Theresa J. Enos 25th Anniversary Award Recipient

2023 Theresa J. Enos 25th Anniversary Award Recipient

Defining quantitative rules for identifying influential researchers: Insights from mathematics domain

In the midst of a vast amount of scientific literature, the need for specific rules arise especially when it comes to deciding which impactful researchers should be nominated. These rules are based on measurable quantities that can easily be applied to a researcher's quantitative data. Various search engines, like Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Web of Science etc. Are used for recording metadata such as the researcher's total publications, their citations, h-index etc. However, the scientific community has not yet agreed upon a single set of criteria that a researcher has to meet in order to secure a spot on to the list of impactful researchers. In this study, we have provided a comprehensive set of rules for the scientific community within the field of mathematics, derived from the top five quantitative parameters belonging to each category. Within each categorical grouping, we meticulously selected the five most pivotal parameters. This selection process was guided by an importance score, that was derived after assessing its influence on the model's performance in the classification of data pertaining to both awardees and non awardees. To perform the experiment, we focused on the field of mathematics and used a dataset containing 525 individuals who received awards and 525 individuals who did not receive awards. The rules were developed for each parameter category using the Decision Tree Algorithm, which achieved an average accuracy of 70 to 75 percent for identifying awardees in mathematics domains. Moreover, the highest-ranked parameters belonging to each category were successful in elevating over 50 to 55 percent of the award recipients to positions within the top 100 ranked researchers' list. These findings have the potential to serve as a guidance for individual researchers, who aimed on to making it to the esteemed list of distinguished scientists. Additionally, the scientific community can utilize these rules to sift through the roster of researchers for a subjective evaluation, facilitating the recognition and rewarding of exceptional researchers in the field.

Flourishing among Canada’s outstanding principal award recipients: the critical role of resilience

ABSTRACT School leaders in Canada face increasing social, political, economic, educational, and professional demands, which often lead to increased workload, stress, burnout, decreased well-being, and lack of work-life balance. Research demonstrates that school principals with high levels of resilience are better at coping with stress and crisis, are generally more effective as leaders, are more connected to schools and districts, and have lower levels of compassion fatigue. Examining the challenges that school principals face can both prevent conditions that decrease their well-being and help understand coping strategies and resilience-building approaches necessary for successful school leadership. Drawing from the study of flourishing among the national award-winning principals in the Canada’s Outstanding Principals (COP) program, in this article we describe the participants’ perceptions regarding their resilience as school leaders, the conditions that discouraged school principals in their role, and the approaches that allowed them to develop their personal resilience. The article offers recommendations on how school administrators can overcome the challenges and flourish by fostering resilience and growing a resilient mind-set.

Laudation for Prof. Dr. Melissa A. DENECKE: 2023 Hevesy Medal Award recipient

Laudation for Prof. Dr. Melissa A. DENECKE: 2023 Hevesy Medal Award recipient

Innovation in motion

Award recipients advance digital tool, novel device

Undergraduate Research Learning in the Liberal Arts: A Case Study of Transformative Student-Faculty Collaborations

To cultivate a learning environment promoting meaningful engagement with research, Huron University College—a small, primarily undergraduate liberal arts institution—launched the Centre for Undergraduate Research Learning (CURL). One major initiative of CURL's pilot phase was to fund extracurricular research opportunities (Student Fellowships) for undergraduate students. These projects enable students to conduct independent research projects with the guidance of a faculty mentor. The current paper presents the findings from a case study of the first four CURL Student Research Fellowship award recipients and their faculty mentors, using the concept of transformative experience (Heddy and Pugh, 2015) as the lens to conduct a content analysis of participant interviews. Our findings show evidence of substantive dialogue and active collaboration between students and their faculty mentors, providing a safe space for students to experiment, explore and develop their research skills. The students articulated development of specific skills related to research process, connection between theory and practice, as well as personal intellectual and interpersonal gains, which are suggestive of a transformative experience in progress. Although this paper reports on a limited sample, the findings may provide insight into the potential transformative impact of mentored undergraduate research experiences in the liberal arts.

AAAS Honors 2024 Award Recipients.

Awards recognize contributions to science diplomacy, mentoring, public engagement, and more.

The Invention of Tribology: Peter Jost’s Contribution

Peter Jost is known to the international tribology community as the father of the subject—‘the man who made the world spin a little easier’. He was the author of the eponymous ‘Jost Report’, the report of the Working Group set up in 1964 to investigate the state of lubrication education and research in the UK. Over the following five decades, up to his death in 2016, he was tireless in extolling the importance of tribology to manufacturing efficiency, energy conversion and environmental sustainability. He was instrumental in establishing the International Tribology Council and its prestigious gold, silver and bronze medals. Jost was himself the recipient of numerous national and international awards. In 1976, he was the President of the Institution of Production Engineers, and in 2013, he received the Sustained Achievement Award from the Royal Academy of Engineering. What is less well known is the story behind the Jost report—what was it that led the recently elected Labour government and its newly established Ministry of Technology to investigate lubrication and to choose Jost to lead the investigating panel? The story illustrates the combination of serendipity and determination on which success can so often depend.

Gender Disparities in Academic Otolaryngology.

The aim was to evaluate representation of women in otolaryngology by examining authorship of research publications and presentations, awards, research grants, leadership, and membership in related organizations. Authorship was reviewed from articles published in three otolaryngology journals from 2000 through 2021 to assess the frequency and percentages of female and combination of male and female gender authorship. Gender was evaluated for poster and scientific abstract presentations from 2007 to 2021. Gender representation was reviewed for institutional and society leadership positions, award, and grant recipients in the American Laryngological Society (ALA). Changes in the frequency of female and combination of male and female gender authorship over time were examined with Cochran-Armitage test for trend. A total of 16,921 articles, 1,017 presentations, 480 leadership positions, 129 president positions, and 1,137 awards and grants were studied. Women were first authors in 4,153 (24.9%) and last authors in 2,935 (17.8%) published articles for which gender could be determined. Women were first authors in 372 (37.4%) presentations and last authors in 199 (20.2%). Most presentations had a combination of male and female presentation authorship (630, 68%). Women held 69 (14.4%) leadership positions. Of the award and grant recipients, 327 (28.8%) were female. Significant trends were observed for increasing female representation (first authorship publications increased 69.9% from 2000 to 2020, first authorship presentations increased 73.9% from 2007 to 2013, p < 0.001; leadership and awards from 3% to 18% representation, p = 0.02). The proportion of women receiving awards and holding leadership positions is increasing. Efforts that promote gender diversity may further increase representation of women in otolaryngology literature and among the grant and award winners. Level N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Congratulations to the 2024 TMS Division Award Recipients

Congratulations to the 2024 TMS Division Award Recipients

Recognizing the 2024 TMS Society Award Recipients

Recognizing the 2024 TMS Society Award Recipients

Research productivity and gender of research award recipients in international ophthalmology societies

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the research productivity and gender of award recipients of ophthalmology research awards in international societies.MethodsThis is a retrospective, observational study. The study...

Interview with the 2024 Gaston Labat Award Recipient: Dr. Christopher L. Wu

Interview with the 2024 Gaston Labat Award Recipient: Dr. Christopher L. Wu

Interview with the 2024 Distinguished Service Award Recipient: Dr. Colin J. McCartney

Interview with the 2024 Distinguished Service Award Recipient: Dr. Colin J. McCartney

Interview with Marie‐Pier Hébert The 2023 Raymond L. Lindeman Award Recipient

Interview with Marie‐Pier Hébert The 2023 Raymond L. Lindeman Award Recipient

2024 ACGME Award Recipients.

2024 ACGME Award Recipients.

Gender distribution of North American professional radiology society award recipients

PurposeWomen remain underrepresented in radiology and there is a paucity of literature examining the recognition of their professional contributions to the discipline. The purpose of this study was to examine the gender distribution of award winners across all North American radiology societies. MethodsThe gender distribution of 1923 award recipients from 21 North American radiology societies between 1960 and 2021 was examined. Awards were divided into four categories: leadership, teaching, contribution to radiology, and promising new/young societal member. Primary outcome was the total proportion of awards received by gender. All data was compared to the gender distribution of working radiologists in North America. ResultsA total of 1923 award recipients were identified between 1960 and 2021. Seventy-nine percent of award recipients were men (n = 1527) and 21 % were women (n = 396). As of 1970, the proportion of women award recipients increased 0.55 % ± 0.07 % each year. The proportion of women receiving radiological awards after 2018 is equal to or surpassing the percentage of women radiologists. Women received 36.4 % of leadership, 33.6 % of promising new member, 30.1 % of teaching, and 14.4 % of lifetime contribution awards. ConclusionsIn the last five years, the proportion of women receiving awards was equal to or greater than the proportion of women radiologists. Women received more leadership awards and fewer lifetime contributor awards compared to men.